Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 770M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4064 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+20887%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 770M
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Aug 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
4096
Shading Units
32
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.000 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
G96
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
