Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +460%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000M
2.995 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Aug 2015
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1536
256
TMUs
96
128
ROPs
64
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.60 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.995 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
93.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GM204
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
N16E-Q5-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy