Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
15808 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 2400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +6862%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
16384
Shading Units
576
1024
TMUs
48
0
ROPs
32
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
408 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

2400W
TDP
75W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
100 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy