Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 2GB VRAM Quadro M620 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 64% (1600MHz vs 977MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
15872 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+5143%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro M620 Mobile
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Jan 2017
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
756 MHz
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
977 MHz
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
16384
Shading Units
512
1024
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
408 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.63 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.26 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.26 GFLOPS
Board Design
2400W
TDP
30W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
100 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
