ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
3976 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
+5446%
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Mar 2016
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Capsaicin
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.0
