Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 219W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 +368%
0.674 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
3
Compute Units
-
120
Shading Units
240
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
GT200B
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

73W
TDP
219W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy