Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V5600 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

ATI FireGL V5600 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 89W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300 +1531%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
32bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
3
Compute Units
12
120
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Navi 24
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

89W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy