Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V7600 vs ATI FirePro V3800

ATI FireGL V7600 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (43W vs 127W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800 +35%
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Apr 2010
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
400
16
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

127W
TDP
43W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Redwood
R600 GL
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy