Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

ATI FireGL V7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (127W vs 219W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 +75%
0.674 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
320
Shading Units
240
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

127W
TDP
219W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GT200B
R600 GL
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy