Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (159W vs 265W)
AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 x2 +649%
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Feb 2016
FireGL
Generation
FirePro Server
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
265W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Tonga
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Cloudy Tau
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
5 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy