Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2

ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (31W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600 +1028%
0.44 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Oct 2009
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
320
Shading Units
16
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

159W
TDP
31W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GT218
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
GT218-325-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy