Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1630 +315%
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Jun 2022
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1740 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
320
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.56 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI1x HDMI 2.01x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
TU117
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
TU117-150-KA-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy