Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2

ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (159W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1072MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 X2 +461%
2.47 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Nov 2013
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1072 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1152
16
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.73 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.470 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
102.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GK104
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
GK104-225-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy