Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1188MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 +314%
1.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Aug 2015
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1024 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1188 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.02 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.02 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.825 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
90W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GM206
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
GM206-250-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy