Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7600

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2440MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7600 +4443%
19.99 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Aug 2023
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2440 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
156.2 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.98 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.99 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
624.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Navi 33
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Navi 33 XL (215-163000057)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy