Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs ATI FirePro V8700

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs ATI FirePro V8700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 151W)
ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Sep 2008
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
-
Shading Units
800
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
R500
Architecture
TeraScale
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
151W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy