Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1677MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 345W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2017
Release Date
Jan 2007
Vega
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

1406 MHz
Base Clock
-
1677 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
-
256
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

107.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
429.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
27.48 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
858.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

345W
TDP
32W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
RV516
Vega 10 XTX
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
R500
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
UMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy