Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 315 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
Lower TDP (32W vs 33W)
NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
16 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Feb 2011
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
16
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-300-B1
R500
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
33W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
3.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy