Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon R9 380X

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon R9 380X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 380X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 380X 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (182.4GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Nov 2015
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1425 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
182.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.04 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.973 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
3.973 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
248.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
190W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Antigua
-
GPU Variant
Antigua XT (215-0877016)
R500
Architecture
GCN 3.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
5 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy