Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Feb 2024
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
22
-
Shading Units
2816
4
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
R500
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy