Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1545 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
-
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.127 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
7.127 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
111.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
90W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GA107
-
GPU Variant
GA107-140-A1
R500
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy