Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2394MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Nov 2022
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1387 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2394 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
20GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
84
-
Shading Units
5376
4
TMUs
336
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
459.6 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
804.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
103.0 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
51.48 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.609 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT (215-145000156)
R500
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy