Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2260 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

ATI FireMV 2260 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2260 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireMV 2260
0.04 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +8412%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Mar 2014
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1792
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
40.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x mini-DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Orthrus
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy