Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2260 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

ATI FireMV 2260 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2260 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
5080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireMV 2260
0.04 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6900X +54950%
22.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Aug 2021
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2150 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
80
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
5120
4
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
275.2 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
688.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.03 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.02 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1376 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Navi 21
-
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy