Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2260 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

ATI FireMV 2260 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2260 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
2008 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireMV 2260
0.04 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X +10140%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Oct 2013
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
40.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy