Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2260 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

ATI FireMV 2260 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2260 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireMV 2260
0.04 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285 +8125%
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Sep 2014
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1792
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
190W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Tonga
-
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
5 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy