ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Apr 2020
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
-
Shading Units
896
4
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Rage 9
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
-
Shader Model
6.6
