Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA RTX A5000-8Q

ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA RTX A5000-8Q

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 and 8GB VRAM RTX A5000 8Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 230W)
NVIDIA RTX A5000-8Q 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
8192 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1170 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
203 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

64MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.496GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
64
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
8192
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
64
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
162.7 GPixel/s
1.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
433.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.77 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
27.77 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
433.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV380
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
-
Rage 9
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
130 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
230W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

9.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
-
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy