Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2331MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400 +11087%
3.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
12
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Navi 24
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy