ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD FirePro W7000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1240 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
FirePro W7000
+7500%
2.432 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1280
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Pitcairn
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
