ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 105W)
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
+1453%
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
105W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
RV670
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
