ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 160W)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
760 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
+3650%
1.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2008
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
800
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
160W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
RV770
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
