Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 236W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (141.7GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280 +1843%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1107 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
141.7GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
40
Shading Units
240
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.26 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
236W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GT200
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
G200-300-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy