ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3070 TiM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 220W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5848 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3070 TiM
+51775%
16.6 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2022
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
46
40
Shading Units
5888
4
TMUs
184
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
135.4 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
259.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.60 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.60 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
259.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
220W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GA104
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
