Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2520 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 +42150%
13.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2505 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
40
Shading Units
2560
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
AD107
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy