Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA P104 100

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA P104 100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 4GB VRAM P104 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 130W)
NVIDIA P104 100 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1733MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
P104 100 +20696%
6.655 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Dec 2017
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1607 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
320.3GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
15
40
Shading Units
1920
4
TMUs
120
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.9 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
208.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
104.0 GFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.655 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
208.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GP104
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
GP104-100-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy