Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM +2875%
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Dec 2013
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
930 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Cape Verde
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy