ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 45W)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
+425%
0.168 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Feb 2008
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
120
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
168.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
45W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
RV630
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
