ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2264 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+17800%
5.728 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2017
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Ellesmere
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
