Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel GMA 3650

AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel GMA 3650

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM GMA 3650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock905MHz
352 additional rendering cores
Intel GMA 3650 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300 +1595%
0.695 TFLOPS
GMA 3650
0.041 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Oct 2008
Trinity
Generation
GMA Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
-
905 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
32
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
1
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
640.0 MPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.560 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.96 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Cedarview
A300
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
PowerVR SGX545
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

65W
TDP
13W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1
4.4
OpenGL
ES 2.0
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy