Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics P6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (905MHz vs 800MHz)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300 +13%
0.695 TFLOPS
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Sep 2014
Trinity
Generation
HD Graphics-W
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
800 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
6
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Broadwell GT3e
A300
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Generation 8.0
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

65W
TDP
15W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.0
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy