Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs AMD FirePro A320

AMD FirePro A300 vs AMD FirePro A320

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 100W)
AMD FirePro A320 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (955MHz vs 905MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300
0.695 TFLOPS
FirePro A320 +5%
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2012
Trinity
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
955 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.640 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.92 GTexel/s
-
-
-
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
733.4 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Devastator
A300
GPU Variant
A320
TeraScale 3
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
32 nm
Process Size
32 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
1.303 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy