Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP

AMD FirePro A300 vs AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 448SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 99% (1800MHz vs 905MHz)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300
0.695 TFLOPS
Radeon Graphics 448SP +132%
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2021
Trinity
Generation
Lucienne
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
IGP

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
7
384
Shading Units
448
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.226 TFLOPS
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Lucienne
A300
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
32 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
9.8 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
156 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy