Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel UHD Graphics P750

AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel UHD Graphics P750

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics P750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (905MHz vs 900MHz)
128 additional rendering cores
Intel UHD Graphics P750 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300 +50%
0.695 TFLOPS
UHD Graphics P750
0.461 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2021
Trinity
Generation
HD Graphics-W
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
256
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
921.6 GFLOPS
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
460.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
115.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Rocket Lake GT1
A300
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
14 nm+++
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy