Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU

AMD FirePro A300 vs NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM Jetson Nano GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (921MHz vs 905MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300 +194%
0.695 TFLOPS
Jetson Nano GPU
0.236 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2019
Trinity
Generation
Tegra
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
IGP

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
640 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
921 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
128
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.74 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.74 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
471.6 GFLOPS
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
235.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
GM20B
A300
GPU Variant
TM660M-A2
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
32 nm
Process Size
20 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
2 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
5.3
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy