AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD FirePro W4100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro D300
+237%
2.176 TFLOPS
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2014
Release Date
Aug 2014
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
