Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
1040 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300 +222%
2.176 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
1280
Shading Units
240
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
219W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GT200B
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy