Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 205 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300 +4735%
2.176 TFLOPS
GeForce 205 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Nov 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GT218
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
GT218-200-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
31W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy