Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
1208 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300 +1057%
2.176 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Feb 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
9
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
72
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GT215
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
43W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy