Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.1GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 +131%
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Mar 2019
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
192.1GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
1280
Shading Units
1408
80
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
120W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
TU116
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
TU116-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy